Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avro Anson RI-003

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 14:54, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Avro Anson RI-003

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot see why this individual aircraft passes WP:GNG. TheLongTone (talk) 12:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It passes GNG because the article cites two independent reliable sources with substantial coverage. Surprisingly, this particular aircraft seems rather famous in Indonesia: there is even a memorial to it. Now, wikinotability doesn't care about memorials but it does care about sources. Meeting the GNG criteria only provides a presumption for an article, not a guarantee, so if you'd like to come back with a further reason for a deletion I'll say if I agree. Thincat (talk) 13:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

merge to Avro Anson I find it peculiar that there's no mention of this aircraft in the main article, so there's a problem, but the few sentences could easily be merged into it in the various appropriate places. Mangoe (talk) 14:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:40, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:40, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:10, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article's creator has replied to the AFD notification on their talk page User talk:Naval Scene#Deletion discussion about Avro Anson RI-003. Thincat (talk) 07:53, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to be a reasonably historic aircraft. Andrew D. (talk) 17:42, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seems this individual aircraft, its purchase, and subsequent loss have received GNG. I definitely would not merge to Avro Anson (a type with 11,000 produced) - if a merge is considered - then to Indonesian Air Force or other Indonesia specific aviation/history article. There are multiple books and news items covering this, and the aircraft itself, as evident in the article, has a monument.Icewhiz (talk) 11:59, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:01, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Reference 2 has a page-and-a-bit specifically about this plane; and I've just added another citation, a 4-page newspaper article. Narky Blert (talk) 07:56, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the reasons given in my comment above. Thincat (talk) 10:27, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Old Ironsides was just an ordinary frigate.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:15, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.