Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azriel/Eternal Lord Split
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as non notable non album. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:34, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Azriel/Eternal Lord Split (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article on the band Azriel has been deleted and this album makes it even less notable nor does it assert notability. It can be merged with Eternal Lord if necessary but otherwise, delete. JForget 22:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Band isn't notable, so album isn't notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete I wish there was a db-album. Band is redlinked and so should this. --Pmedema (talk) 23:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While I think it's possible for an album to be notable but one/all of the contributors not to be, this doesn't seem to be the case. There's nothing that suggests this is special or notable in any way. Celarnor Talk to me 00:03, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable bands. Isn't even an album.--Michig (talk) 07:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.