Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahare Alavi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bahare Alavi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been denied multiple times in the Articles for Creation process. However, it had been moved to the mainspace by the creator in disregard of the issues raised. Namely, it is my and previous reviewers' stance that the subject does not meet the general notability guideline. Most of the text and sources are obituary-like and the salvageable content would better fit as a part or section in another article. The article was similarly deleted on the Farsi Wikipedia. Dege31 (talk) 17:12, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article's sources are complete and she is well-known among the Women and human right activists.حمیدنوذری (talk) 05:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom and checking source and trivial coverage of the subject Mardetanha (talk) 11:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:55, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm not seeing any coverage that stands out as being independent, significant, and reliable, so I don't think that the GNG is met. My searches aren't finding any additional sources, although I'm always glad to reëvaluate if something more can be identified. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Well sourced and passes notability. [[1]] Let's also not be to fast to exclude sources that Americans or Westerners may discount due to the fact many of these regions have no media. This is. An example of that [[2]]

Super (talk) 03:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Signing a letter (along with 213 others) does not establish notability, nor does being mentioned on a blog. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

She lived in a country that was repressive to women. The fact she has a much a she does is proof enough of notability. Super (talk) 15:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

keep She was not only a signer of a very imoprtant letter in women right history in iran but one of the most active human right fighter and leader who tried to lead other people to participate the campaign of reforming anti women laws in Iran and she was well-known for all people in that campaign.حمیدنوذری (talk) 13:00, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above, lots of RS and passes WP:GNG. Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.