Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baliochila barnesi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) WJ94 (talk) 14:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Baliochila barnesi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Next to no information about this species to be found. This short article is about everything one can source. Griseo veritas (talk) 14:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - This is a valid species under an accepted name, and has three RS citations.
awkwafaba (📥) 15:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep given what I’ve learned from others input here and the existence of SPECIESOUTCOMES. Griseo veritas (talk) 08:19, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.