Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bane Hunter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sockpuppets have been ignored. Courcelles (talk) 13:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bane Hunter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the misdeed (not sure it's a crime, since there were no criminal penalties) and civil penalty were noteworthy, this individual does not have enough in-depth coverage about the person themselves, outside the event, to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Referring to Wikipedia:BIO1E the guidelines allow for an article to be created for "both the event and the individual" if "media coverage of both the event and the individual's role grow larger". Indeed I have created an article ASIC v GetSwift Ltd which covers the particulars of the single civil case in more detail, and I hope to express below why I believe Hunter's role deserves its own article.
My proclamation is that Hunter's role (as Director then later CEO) became more than just ASIC v GetSwift Ltd and was significant and a major contribution to the public discourse which followed the company GetSwift. His role became the story as evidence by Hunter himself receiving the largest penalty of the three individuals involved in the event, but also the largest penalty ever imposed by the Australian Federal Court. This is further supported by the Australian Securities Exchange changing public company listing rules requiring all directors to be of "good fame and character" as a result of Hunter's actions.
I have added comprehensive coverage from numerous and multiple national media outlets covering Hunter over the course of five years.
In summary, Hunter's involvement in ASIC v GetSwift Ltd was so significant and his personal contribution was covered in such detail by the media over such a long period of time and extends beyond a single event ASIC v GetSwift Ltd it satisfies the "single event" notability test allowed for by Wikipedia:BIO1E and justifies the creation of seperate articles.
Finally as commented separately, I'm a relatively new editor and I've tried to follow other articles in Category:Australian businesspeople and whilst I acknowledge some of the aforementioned linked articles could be flagged, Hunter is more notable than many.
I appreciate your re-consideration for deletion and welcome any further discussion JMichaelLee (talk) 11:37, 22 March 2023 (UTC)JMichaelLee (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.