Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladeshi hackers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This article may be notable after all, but the consensus is that the current article is completely unusable. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladeshi hackers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are many "Bangaldeshi hackers" in the news, but this article is not clear how this would be a stand alone article. Marvellous Spider-Man 13:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 10:10, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 05:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:OR; an unreferenced essay. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but heavy overhaul of the article's content. No doubt this topic seems to be notable based on a google search, but as is the article content is unacceptable.--Prisencolin (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete Per nomination. Coderzombie (talk) 18:36, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT#OR. This is such a badly written article with no fixed scope. More importantly is purely being used for promotion with the addition of all those links. Per WP:NOTPROMO this is a perfect candidate for TNT. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:15, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.