Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bango plc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bango plc

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Nothing useful on Google. This article contains 6 sources: 4 are directly form company website and describe company products, one is PDF hosted on company Wordpress account and is just a pitch to investors, one source (strongest of all) is an article heavily quoting from company spokesperson and mostly reiterating company claims, no commentary at all. Anton.bersh (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 5 of the 6 sources listed are wholly managed by the company in question and there’s not much press coverage other than about the stock value, which itself doesn’t make the company notable.GeekBurst (talk) 23:51, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article setting out a company's wares, supported by references to its own site. Searches find passing mentions of their 2005 IPO [1], to partnerships such as that recently with Digital Turbine [2], plus various stock-tip items, but none of these passes beyond trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Without better, this fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 12:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.