Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bank of America Plaza (Tucson)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bank of America Plaza (Tucson)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Subject does not have coverage that meets significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings. // Timothy :: talk 18:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 18:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 18:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Was once the tallest building in Tucson. Under it's original name "Arizona Bank Plaza," was recognized by the American Concrete Institute as the "Outstanding Concrete Structure of 1976.[1] Not only is there in-depth coverage under its current name,[2] but there was more front page news when it was built under its original name. [3] as well as some more architectural details in the book Culture in the American Southwest: The Earth, the Sky, the People. [4] Lasting notability has been established. Oakshade (talk) 02:02, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per Oakshade; seems to have more than just directory listings Spiderone 11:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Oakshade amd Spiderone. -Hatchens (talk) 17:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above discussion and "An older building that is at least 20 years old, and was the tallest in its area, might be considered notable," per my standards. Bearian (talk) 21:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.