Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Abbott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:51, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Abbott

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to satisfy notability criteria for academics. GLG GLG (talk) 01:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 7. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:53, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 02:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think this page was hastily flagged. As seen by the new citations added, this scholar has written a long list of well-cited publications and has served on the editorial board of several top-tier academic journals.LingLass (talk) 05:35, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per WP:PROFESSOR "1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." Sources in the article demonstrate that Abbot's work has had exactly this kind of impact. Note also that this article is one of a series by an editor who has made a generous contribution to WP by writing a series of intelligent and well-supported articles on linguists and linguists. And remember, please, always to ask: WP:DDH.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:45, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. We don't have a lot of indicia of notability but I think the citation counts on Google scholar (170, 162, 122, 100, etc) are above threshold for WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.