Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrons Lane, Georgia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Macon County, Georgia. ✗plicit 13:39, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barrons Lane, Georgia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a railroad crossing, no houses or buildings in the vicinity. I doubt this is a community. wizzito | say hello! 22:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. wizzito | say hello! 22:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. wizzito | say hello! 22:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Older topos show a rail siding with several buildings and there are a few newspaper mentions of trains leaving from there, timetables, etc. I did find a couple mentions of people being from/of there, but this just means it was used as a landmark and doesn't necessarily indicate a community. This looks to be a former train station at best and in any case there's nowhere near enough significant coverage to meet WP:GEOLAND/WP:GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 23:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Macon County, Georgia. In 1885 it was the name of a train stop; in 1889 melons were being loaded onto trains there, and in 1893 some people lived in "the immediate vicinity of Barron's Lane". In 1924 there was another railroad track there; In 1942 people remembered the good old days packing peaches there. While it wasn't a populated place, it was certainly a thing that existed (unlike many of the "geostubs" that warp and weft through AfD). jp×g 17:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect I am not convinced of the notability. But. redirect is WP:CHEAP. Lightburst (talk) 14:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: per above. Qwerfjkl talk 20:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.