Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beat Kuert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beat Kuert

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article full of original research and puffery fails GNG and ARTIST in large part because the key claims about exhibitions are false/misleading, and none of the claims about films are verifiable. Florence Biennale is a vanity exhibition, and Palazzo Bembo is where ECC stages their vanity shows concurrent with the Venice Biennale. None of the citations to NYT worked. I searched the site for all the terms, and again in their film reviews, but nothing. None of the awards were verifiable either. Even if they were verifiable they aren't enough for NARTIST. Theredproject (talk) 18:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 18:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 18:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 18:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 18:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, for his films, which do have some coverage. NARTIST fail but weak pass on GNG. Apply TNT to article. Does not seem notable for his art career, although I cannot be bothered to plumb the depths of the enormously inflated article to determine the fine art notability precisely.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:49, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I tried to clean up some of the many citations and noticed the quality of citations is pretty low right now. If it's decided this is a "keep" and since this is a BLP, it needs a lot more clean up and removal of unsourced fluff. A lot of edits and sources from Oct 2014 seemed to be questionable. Jooojay (talk) 22:52, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable film director.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:29, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If this is going to get kept, and that should only happen if someone manages to dig up some better sources that say something -about- the work rather than list or mention it in announcements and press releases, it would need to be reduced to a stub. The current content is not supported by sources. Had we cleaned it up, we would have been left with almost nothing. Vexations (talk) 14:05, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.