Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedford Hill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:32, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bedford Hill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article is not notable. Of the four references and one external link listed at the bottom of this article, only one actually mentions "Bedford Hill" as the name of a neighborhood, and I couldn't find any other sources that mention this neighborhood. --Julian (talk) 00:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per the nomination. No references or cites, never heard the term name outside of this article. Fitnr (talk) 00:58, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Found a few businesses in the area that use the name, but a few trade names can hardly amalgamate into a notable geographic term. It doesn't seem to be a noteworthy unofficial monicker either. I find more hits for Westchester, not the same. JFHJr (㊟) 04:58, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bedford–Stuyvesant, Brooklyn Under WP:GEOLAND, Populated places without legal recognition, and where another legal name already exists, it does not have WP:SIGCOV to warrant the reliability of the name as well as the verifiability of the article content. Mkdw ^talk 08:48, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 09:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – the subject clearly isn't notable. -Joeholmes (talk) 03:03, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.