Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedowyn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 19:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bedowyn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Not a single independent reference produced. Searches yield nothing of worth other than social media and self promotion and directory listing, Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 10:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:13, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:13, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:13, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - There are sources. They range from the niche, to the niche and probably unreliable, completely indeterminate reliability, the decidedly local, and whatever this is. But I'm not really seeing much that manages to be in depth, reliable, and broad in scope all at the same time. Probably still slightly too soon. No prejudice against recreation if the sources improve over the next year or so. TimothyJosephWood 13:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 22:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable, promotional, not encyclopedic. --Lockley (talk) 02:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - there is some coverage, but I'm still not certain how much that counts here. Bearian (talk) 13:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist - consensus still unclear
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Exemplo347 (talk) 19:53, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a nn band. Having a song included in a video game is hardly a claim to notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.