Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beejan Olfat
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Beejan Olfat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:ENT and WP:CREATIVE. for all the claims in the article he gets only 2 passing mentions in gnews [1]. IMDB reveals only minor roles nothing significant. the young playwrights awards are not major awards either. LibStar (talk) 02:13, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 09:31, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 05:52, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom: WP:BIO isn't met Nick-D (talk) 02:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I have to agree this is nothing significant in the article, as always there's a chance someday there will be a source, but for now I say delete. SwisterTwister (talk) 05:53, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.