Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belize–Turkey relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Belize–Turkey relations

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Article based on 1 primary source. No third party coverage to meet GNG. LibStar (talk) 01:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Turkey, and Caribbean. LibStar (talk) 01:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belize-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's rather annoying when editors engage in drive-by removal of PROD tags then don't even bother to participate in the AfD to explain why the article should be kept, especially when giving a bogus rationale for removing the tag. The lack of participation in this AfD demonstrates PROD was in fact suitable. Not all Country A-Country B relations articles meet notability requirements or are even useful for an encyclopedia. This one isn't and it doesn't even have a single secondary source. AusLondonder (talk) 17:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per above. Agree that there is a lack of WP:SIGCOV and than X-Y relations are not inherently notable. Yilloslime (talk) 22:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Primary sources galore, plus the strong odor of insignificance. -The Gnome (talk) 14:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There's barely anything notable to expand on. Aintabli (talk) 00:15, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.