Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Alekzsander Williams
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 December 19. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tiptoety talk 05:16, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ben Alekzsander Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A non notable bit part actor and band member. No evidence towards notability provided or available on searching. Nuttah (talk) 16:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The band might just pass the muster if some more links are dug up, but in the current state delete it all. --fvw* 16:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment could I ask what you believe is on the road to notability? Nuttah (talk) 17:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Mostly this link. It's just a regional bbc page, but it looks like it isn't user submitted content. Mind you, if we were discussing the band with just the links listed here, I'd still say delete. --fvw* 17:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Apart from the disclaimer on the index Alphabetical guide to bands submitted to the site. Nuttah (talk) 17:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well yes, apart from that obviously, duh. (Also: oops) --fvw* 17:36, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Apart from the disclaimer on the index Alphabetical guide to bands submitted to the site. Nuttah (talk) 17:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Mostly this link. It's just a regional bbc page, but it looks like it isn't user submitted content. Mind you, if we were discussing the band with just the links listed here, I'd still say delete. --fvw* 17:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment could I ask what you believe is on the road to notability? Nuttah (talk) 17:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: article fails to establish notability. JamesBurns (talk) 05:25, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I say the same as Fvw, and want to add this one comment: Two of his songs are linked. One is a redlink, the other links to something totally unrelated to the article. TopGearFreak 17:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Has own IMDB page and is due to sign to SONY BMG record label. EnjaBenja (talk) 20:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agreed that more verifiable sources are required to establish notability. (I couldn't even access existing refs, except IMDb.) Article looks more like promotional advertising. Snowy 1973 (talk) 17:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete I had it tagged for CSD, but it was declined as borderline. No reliable sources could be found. Of its current sources, one is non-existent, one is to a blog, and one is to an IMDB article which only fleetingly mentions the subject. Fails WP:RS. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:31, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP. Looking very notable with very detailed references, with his own IMDB page, it should stay.CrackersTeam (talk) 00:19, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.