Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beneva Flowers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 23:26, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beneva Flowers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet nobility based on sources giving. Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} 01:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Not enough sources, the ones I found were related to Beneva Corporation, which seems to sponsor this flower shop. That article was created by the same author and g11ed. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 01:20, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Spammy, but has received quite a bit of coverage, including some mentions in books (the first seems to be siginificant coverage, not sure about the last as the preview doesn't let me see it). They've appeared to have won some "top 25 in the US" prize more than once, from Teleflora, so it seems fairly notable with the coverage. —fetch ·comms 01:33, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Fetchcomms. It just needs a clean-up. Diego Grez (talk) 01:47, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DaveOMac. I thought I had enough sources to make this article valuable. Also Beneva Corporation was the company name that was created to group all of Beneva Flowers companies and divisions under. The term is no longer used as a company and I believe does not exist in any form anymore. User:DaveOMac (talk) 11:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The Second book was made by the Ceo Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} 01:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes I made the Beneva Corp article but I had no idea what I was doing then and realized it was done all wrong. After about a year of seeing if I had it clear how to write buisness articles I tried again more appropriately.User:DaveOMac (talk) 11:51, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sufficient notability, as far as florists go. -- œ ^™ 18:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.