Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeoCom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

BeoCom

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closing) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:N Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep I see some coverage in design mags. I'm not at all familiar with the product but it appears that it may be notable. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 18:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are a range of articles over several years. Mangoe (talk) 04:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Coverage in the International Herald Tribune and New York Times. Jfire (talk) 21:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sources found by Jfire. --Pixelface (talk) 22:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable product, design has been talked about in many places. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 00:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.