Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Better Bathrooms (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:32, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Better Bathrooms

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There isn't any notability here. Here's why.

Source 1 is the org's companies house page = primary. 2. Has no indication of editorial standards and seems to consist of direct quotes and information copied from a press release. It certainly doesn't offer any WP:SIGCOV 3. Is an interview and therefore primary. 4. Routine press announcedment. Not SigCov 5. See above (paraphrased from the same press relese. 6. Not RS, routine press announcement and again no SigCov 7. Primary and awards don't count towards the notability of companies 8. Same source as source two. 9. Another short, routine press anouncement in a trade journal largely consisting of direct quotes. Clearly primary. Clearly no indication of editorial standards. 10. Features the CEO not the company. Once again the piece consists of direct quotes and sesationalism while there is no indication that EBM has any editorial independence or standards. 11. Routine press announcement about new store + see above. 12. Another routine press announcement about another new store. 13. Is a promoted story i.e paid media. 14. Another routine press anouncement that uses the same photos as sources 2 and eight which wreerks of chrunalism. 15. Awards do not indicate notability for businesses/organisations. 16. Bears a striking resemblence to two and eight. Possibly paraphrashed by a different "journalist" reading from the same hymn sheet. 17. Titled Better Bathrooms are Best. Article is another routine announcement about another industry award. 18. Routine announcement about an award nomination. Certainly not SigCov and I doubt whether Kitchen and Bathroom News is RS. 19. Company website. 20. Talks about a brush with the ASA but it is essentially news coverage of a single event. Daily Spider Glee (talk) 16:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Daily Spider Glee (talk) 16:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Daily Spider Glee (talk) 16:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:40, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eternal Shadow Talk 19:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as sourced only to its own PR. Mccapra (talk) 06:38, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:57, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.