Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betzalel Busel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 05:37, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Betzalel Busel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability, no reliable sources provided. Would have PRODded but was contested by article creator last year. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. FuriouslySerene (talk) 19:08, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no clear indication of notability. Blackguard 22:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The institution he is a leader of has about 100 post-secondary students. So even if he was clearly the top academic officer, which is not clear to me, I don't think he is a leading one enough to establish notability on those grounds, and nothing else jumps out to say he is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per all above. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 03:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.