Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BibleTime (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deletion as a recreation of previously deleted material. ChrisO (talk) 19:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- BibleTime (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Open source software with trivial RS coverage that's already been deleted once. There are copious ghits: mailing litsts, forums, blogs and howtos, but no evidence of notability for this software. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 06:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC) For the same reason, I'm bundling the following. Wikipedia is not a directory for non-notable software:[reply]
- BiblePro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), lack of rs coverage
- BibleWorks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), lack of rs coverage
- PC Study Bible (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), lack of non-trivial RS coverage
- Workman's Study Bible (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), lack of sources, this one doesn't even appear to be full software but rather a module of software
- Davar3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), a harder search due to the Hebrew term but there doesn't appear to be any coverage. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 07:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- BibleDatabase (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), bundled with this AfD. Same reasons. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 16:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. I tagged the article with the WP:N tag yesterday, but I didn't realize this article's been deleted once already for the same lack of WP:RS coverage and WP:N. I would have done it myself if I knew that. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 16:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 16:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.