Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biff Naylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Biff Naylor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline A7 eligible article for a subject that blatantly falls short of WP:BIO as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Celestina007 (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, is this where I defend my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biff_Naylor Please forgive my poor coding skills, I'm sorta new at this. I made some changes and additions that I hope will address the concerns. @Celestina007

For a biographical article, the subject of the article must satisfy WP:BIO that is they must have been discussed with in-depth in reliable sources independent of them & the subject of your article doesn’t satisfy that. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Celestina007 Did you see the additions I made to the story - and additional sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nixols (talk • contribs) 18:23, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, content looks somewhat viable. Geschichte (talk) 20:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 04:48, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. content is significant to California lifestyle and Googie architecture, as well as Restaurant industry importance. Accurately sourced.Intenseca (talk) 08:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Intenseca[reply]

This is the user's second ever edit after a 15-year hiatus. Geschichte (talk) 10:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does your comment add to a thoughtful discussion? For a notable and honored figure in the hospitality industry, and for a major contributor to the unique and fascinating Southern California lifestyle, the article adds historical significance and well-sourced information to the Wikipedia service. The well composed article meets the standards and exacting, non-compromising values that are detailed on this site. Please re-read the first paragraph regarding commenting on other users. Thank you. Intenseca Intenseca (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It simply makes people wonder why a user made his/her second edit in a discussion. Geschichte (talk) 10:46, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable restaurateur. Cbl62 (talk) 22:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Coverage in San Jose Mercury-News, Los Angeles magazine, and Los Angeles Times appears to qualify for notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notable enough for inclusion per WP:GNG. --KartikeyaS (talk) 16:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.