Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birb (Term)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (WP:SNOW close). North America1000 05:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Birb (Term) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
None of the "sources" cited in this article (KYM, Youtube, Urban Dictionary) are reliable, thus this fails WP:WEB. We don't need an article for every single meme anyway. ★Gooseflesh12★ (talk) 17:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - With a chance of snow. Non notable meme. Birb redirects to bird already, but I find it doubtful that the parenthetical title is a particularly plausible redirect. GMGtalk 17:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 17:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I was looking for the way to speedy it seeing that it was largely based on complety unreliable sources and nothing dependable can be found in search. Also not redirect worthy; because redirect with parenthetical qualifier is meaningless. –Ammarpad (talk) 17:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Ammarpad: - it would be a case of creative accounting, but maybe CSD as a recently created page that duplicates Birb. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 18:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- That's probably a little too creative, but that doesn't mean any passing janitor can't snow close this as delete. GMGtalk 18:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Ammarpad: - it would be a case of creative accounting, but maybe CSD as a recently created page that duplicates Birb. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 18:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Not even 'doggo' has its own page. --‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 18:18, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete As per the other editors who weighed in. And Adoil Descended (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable, unreferenced and not reliably verifiable. Might be reliably very fryable, but that's not quite the same thing. If so, fry and serve in BBQ sauce with fries. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Snow delete per nom. —AnAwesomeArticleEditor (talk · contribs) 19:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Snow delete per above. Lepricavark (talk) 22:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.