Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black45King

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (A7 + G11). (non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 07:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Black45King

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, none of the sources indicate notability. Antila333 (talk) 03:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Antila333 (talk) 03:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this reeks of a blatant advertisement as well as the subject being unnotable. dibbydib (T ･ C) 04:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haiti-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:14, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is actually a normal A7/G11 article, and the article is already tagged for A7 deletion. I'll add a G11 tag as well. Java Hurricane 04:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, clearly promotional and not a notable subject
Delete per above, especially WP:N and WP:NOTPROMO. Article was previously speedied for A7, and was quite possibly an autobiogtaphy as well. --Dps04 (talk) 05:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and CSD tags fixed. Eumat114 formerly The Lord of Math (Message) 05:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.