Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackburn Road, Melbourne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blackburn Road, Melbourne

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG. Local road, no claim of notability/significance. Sources confirm it exists, mention some rail crossing improvements, but do not demonstrate there is more than routine local coverage. MB 06:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Australia. MB 06:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per nom fails WP:GNG. Chirota (talk) 06:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above. Iseult^Δxparlez moi 06:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now where it has significant coverage only on ref. 6 which is not able to pass WP:GNG. As we need more references like this where there is an enough coverage in multiple published independent sources of the subject. Fade258 (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and above arguments, but histmerge the 2007 creation back to the old title at Blackburn Road. This page was moved during this subject's creation, and it appears only the article is the problem here, not the longstanding redirect before this. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.