Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Campbell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 20:59, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blake Campbell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough notability for the artist (ex. not signed to a label); only a local article is presented but nothing else. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 19:22, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He has clearly garnered enough support and had been featured on the front page of a major Florida newspaper. Guidelines for having a page is that one must have received a reliable and respected source of recognition, which Blake has clearly received through his feature article. Not only the article but he has received national attention from both Duke point guard Nolan Smith and fitness celebrity John Basedow. He qualifies. Keep page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Webberyt46 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC) — Webberyt46 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't find the number of YouTube subscribers remarkable, and the coverage comes down to one local newspaper article and someone stating 'Special Thanks to my homie Blake Campbell for creating the design for this blog!' in his blog. There doesn't appear to be much else around in the way of coverage.--Michig (talk) 19:14, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing past a single local interest piece. Not enough for wp:n. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Dose not pass wp:n no significant coverage number of subscribers dose not add to notability. Kyle1278 22:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.