Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlaqKeyz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:21, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BlaqKeyz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, de facto unsourced, since none of the references are close to WP:RS Kleuske (talk) 12:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 12:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 12:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: After the nomination, User: Kwamevaughan moved the article to draft and removed the template. Not sure how to handle that. It does not lend extra notability, though. Kleuske (talk) 12:32, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: The article indeed does not meet WPGNG hence moving it to draft to enable me work on gathering relevant sources/links to it. If there aren’t any, I will delete this article. Kwamevaughan (talk)
Good luck. I have done WP:BEFORE and did not get more than passing mentions.You do realize this comes across as gaming the system, right? Kleuske (talk) 12:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.