Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloombase (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 15:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bloombase

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rejected speedy deletion because I considered it a borderline case. Sending here for debate without further comment. Viridae ^{DON'T PANIC} 06:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Viridae ^{DON'T PANIC} 06:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt I'm not seeing what's borderline about this. The sources are garbage and it was already deleted in two other AfDs. Which is why it should be salted. There's zero point in this just being re-created again after it's deleted for a third time. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - None of the sources are usable to establish notability. I am unable to find any coverage in independent reliable sources. My search results are full of market analysis and press releases -- Whpq (talk) 01:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.