Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloomsday Rising
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mgm|(talk) 09:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bloomsday Rising (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:BAND in my opinion. SIS 22:31, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:16, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've tried a search in Google News archives, and also in a library database, to try to find sources that would help to establish WP:N notability. I found none. The lone third-party reference, from SF Weekly, is not enough. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:22, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: could not find verifiable 3rd party sources, as per WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 00:31, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, couldn't find anything that would pass WP:MUSIC. SF Weekly mention is extremely trivial. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 05:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.