Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blythe Brown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dan Brown. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 00:39, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blythe Brown

The article is about the wife of a notable person, but this does not create notability. What she has done herself is to help her husband out on a notable book and write non-notable book herself. She has been talked about in a court case, which she did not even appear at. All the relevant info appears or could easily be copied to Dan Brown or Da Vinci code. Piero da Vinci (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge to Dan Brown She isn't notable in her own right as far as I can see. Whilst she did act as his researcher, I don't see that a researcher would generally pass WP:N on their own. --Ged UK 12:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge to Dan Brown no independent coverage. Hipocrite (talk) 12:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge to Dan Brown or keep if expandable; she is an author in her own right, and there's a fair few reviews of "The bald book".-- Chzz ► 13:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and merge to Dan Brown per all above. Verbal chat 13:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.