Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bo Asmus Kjeldgaard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bo Asmus Kjeldgaard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to the Danish Wikipedia article on Mayor, da:Borgmester in Copenhagen a mayor is the head of a specific management area , not necessarily the head of the city government. In his case, the succession of positions indicates he is just the director of various city departments, and therefore there is no presumption of notability. Nor do the references here or in the Danish equivalent article sufficient to show notability. He did not win the European Solar Prize, according to the reference, he won one of the 7 such prizes awarded in Denmark alone in 2001. DGG ( talk ) 22:22, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of breadth of sources to pass GNG. The nature of the office of mayor in Copenhagen is not such to give default notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' per DGG. Administrators of cities do not have the presumption of notability and must meet WP:GNG - Enos733 (talk) 05:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- a badly written WP:PROMO article with ext links to the subject's current company (Greenovation). Off with it. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.