Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bolaji Olagunju

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Already deleted. Tone 08:15, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bolaji Olagunju

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failing GNG. The coverage is primarily about one event, the founding of a "tech hub". The sources very much give the impression of leaning on the same press pack - even using identical phrases and article structures. The sources are business-as-usual coverage of a company where the subject of the article is mentioned in passing (and also inevitably given his corporate office). Lacking substantial coverage about the individual. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Article creator moved the article to draftspace shortly after AFD began admitting that the subject isn't notable. I think the next step is either move is reverted and AFD continues or mainspace article is deleted and AFD is closed. HandsomeBoy (talk) 15:33, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

as nominator I can only close the AFD as a keep which would be wrong. I have reverted the draftification for the AFD to run its course. The author now implies that the subject is not notable; for ease of the process, a G7 request may be viable which an admin may consider. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 18:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Brockman and HandsomeBoy, sequel to this nomination, I considered the article to be coming too soon and lacking adequate stand for notability. The subject is quite popular but lacks any sufficient reference beyond this event. That was why I kept it as short as I could find reference to. I have done a G7 deletion request. Community over POV. Danidamiobi (talk) 10:12, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.