Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boys Noize

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) J 947 03:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boys Noize

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician, fails notability for music, lots of peacock words - TheMagnificentist 11:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:56, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:13, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:MUSICBIO criteria #1 is met by these three sources: all music bio, The Guardian article and CMJ New Music Monthly. Gab4gab (talk) 15:11, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Comment User User:Imalawyer has been blocked as a sock. Jacona (talk) 12:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 05:17, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:40, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep This article just passes WP:N. However, it does need to be rewritten because of the "peacock words." Imalawyer (talk) 06:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that the above user User:Imalawyer has been confirmed as a Sock puppet of User:Sdc3000.Jacona (talk) 12:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a notable musician. In addition to meeting criteria 1, also meets criteria 2. Not necessarily well known in the English-speaking world.Synchronism (talk) 08:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep His album Power made #24 on the Belgian Album Chart source. The coverage he's received is also substantial. We'd be endorsing a cultural bias to remove this, it says a lot that he's got articles on so many other Wikipedia languages. KaisaL (talk) 19:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.