Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boys Over Flowers (Philippine TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Brandon (talk) 12:55, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boys Over Flowers (Philippine TV series)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crystal article mostly based on speculation/rumours concerning a supposed Boys over Flowers "remake". So far I haven't heard of any official confirmation from Sarah Geronimo or ABS-CBN that backs up this claim. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:26, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Above I've listed a previous AfD discussion for an alternale version of this article. The version currently being discussed is the earlier verison of the article, but another version was created and then deleted while this version was a redirect. Calathan (talk) 15:22, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per my nomination. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:58, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom. -WayKurat (talk) 02:11, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:53, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 17:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Too little information to mean anything. Just because one foreign drama series makes it big in the Philippines, before long, you'll hear some suit say, "we gotta remake this!" I bet some Sarah Geronimo fantard made it.--Eaglestorm (talk) 23:43, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- the article can be improved if more reliable sources such as news sources online or newspapers can be cited. Lots of US rumoured articles are in here in Wikipedia, why not focus in them? Most of them are one-liners. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.191.52.191 (talk) 16:05, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Yes, but rumours are rumours, and as such it will not be accepted here. We're looking for hard and reliable facts, not speculation. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Add to that; please do not use OTHERSTUFFEXISTS to justify your Keep vote. Whatever catcrap you may be doing on Wikia, do not replicate it here. the article is nothing more than a case of squeeing. --Eaglestorm (talk) 14:13, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.