Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley D. Harris

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 00:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley D. Harris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This guy is a professor in a program that was initially set up to train scout leaders (or at least he was a decade ago), which has slightly broderned its scope more recently. Not every such professor is notable. The works he wrote are not notable. We have not even agreed to accept that members of the general presidencies of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints organizations are notable, but clearly the general board members are not notable. His role in the Boy Scouts of America was not at a level or in a way that got public attention enough to show notability. The sources are not fully indepdent, especially not the scouting one. The Deseret News article comes from a human insterest section, so I am not sure it would ever be enough to add towards passing GNG, but it is clearly not enough on its own. I created this article back at a time when I operated on the assumption that virtually all professors and a good portion of published authors were notable. I have since come to realize that there are way too many of both for that to be the case.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.