Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brainsprep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brainsprep

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of any importance, but software applications do not have a CSD. Does not have SIGCOV. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 06:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 06:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 06:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 06:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This is a new user and 14 minutes after the page was created you nominated it for deletion? What happened to don't bite the newcomers? --Whiteguru (talk) 08:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whiteguru, the article creator is not a new user: they have been on WP since 2014 but their prior articles (on associated companies such as Microflick Software Corporation and Brainsapp) have been deleted. See User talk:Jithinrajiv (which also includes COI notices in both 2014 and 2017). AllyD (talk) 09:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - How do we know exactly that the article violates WP:COI as per the template on the page? --Excutient^Talk 10:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Excutient: COI is not relevant in my mind to this AfD, as this software application simply does not pass any notability standard and this is the main thing to evaluate here. If this was an article on a company (and not an app), I would've A7ed it. However, if you were to compare the user name of the creator and the founder of the company that created the application then the COI is evident.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 11:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Doesn't qualify our notability guidelines at Wikipedia. Might become notable in future but delete for now. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pure promotion. --- Possibly ☎ 16:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH - seems to have not accrued the reliable, in-depth coverage that would be needed to establish notability. SamHolt6 (talk) 17:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - neither assertion nor evidence of notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 14:20, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A non notable company.Could not find any sourcesAlphaonekannan (talk) 14:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.