Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brando Chiesa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. For the record, it would help clarify discussion as to *which* sources a !voter feels meets independent, reliable, in-depth coverage. That said, there is reasonable evidence the other editors who argued "delete" have reviewed all presented sources and found them wanting. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:07, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brando Chiesa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are press releases, not editorial. Quote: "Disclaimer: This is a company press release. No HT Group journalist is involved in the creation of this content." Exactly. No independent, reliable sources were used in the creation of this article. Vexations (talk) 18:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:51, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:51, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. All refs are advertising. Johnbod (talk) 00:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all I saw were bogus sources. Example: "He is a severe talent which is getting worldwide recognition for his designs and his Instagram account is followed by top Hollywood stars and all his fans wait for his post as they know it will be different than last and new too."ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes I saw maximum bogus sources(bogus declaration just for the record) but there two realable source i found then i clear all links. All coming members please help for improved the article IndiaBulez (talk) 07:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
IndiaBulez, you should change "Don't Delete" to "Keep". There's a piece of software that keeps track of these (not)votes that may get confused. The (human) closer of this discussion will still understand it, of course. Vexations (talk) 16:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Vexations, Thank you sir.IndiaBulez (talk) 04:00, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 04:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. PR --Devokewater (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to the extremely questionable sourcing in the article and the triviality of the coverage in a few of them. There is one or two sources that might meet WP:GNG, but I don't personally think they would be enough on their own. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.