Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brebes Exit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn too... (non-admin closure) Lourdes 04:29, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brebes Exit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Both a non-notable neologism, and a non-notable intersection. References are trivial coverage while Brexit was in the news, or else exceedingly local. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:19, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exceedingly local? As in national news in the 4th-largest country in the world? This reference for instance has nothing to do with Brexit being in the news. [1] Sumbuddi (talk) 04:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 15:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Major interchange in major country. Coverage is not trivial and completely unrelated to that Brexit. Smartyllama (talk) 20:49, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sources are included in the article. It's a notable kind of topic, like the Orange Crush interchange in southern California. --doncram 04:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I feel that the Orange Crush interchange should be deleted as well, but there's clearly not support for either of those proposals. I withdraw the nomination. Power~enwiki (talk) 04:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep more people are stuck or held up by the traffic in Java every year at the same time - as one of the components - this is an important part - more people are affected by this and related issues than there are populations of smaller countries JarrahTree 08:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.