Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Regan (comedian)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus was to keep. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Regan (comedian)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not relevant, very low quality article. jrabbit05 (talk) 04:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 05:04, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious keep: A popular and well-known stand-up comedian; a Google News search shows a dozen articles from the last month alone. One example: "Brian Regan Preps for New Netflix Special with Aspen Tour Stop", The Aspen Times (Feb 6, 2020). Lots more. -- Toughpigs (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - Found coverage in NPR and the Wall Street Journal, both reliable sources. Passes GNG and AfD is not cleanup. Hog Farm (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
strong keep: strange that this has been slated for deletion. One look at the article shows he is notable. Locochoko (talk) 12:23, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep: This has to be a WP:SNOW keep right? Regan clearly passes WP:ENTERTAINER. He has had multiple standup specials and has even been featured in Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee. Bait30 ^Talk? 20:38, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep I'm not going to mince words like the rest of the vote!s; WP:IDONTLIKEIT isn't a proper deletion rationale. Obviously notable comedian just by name glance alone. Nate • (chatter) 01:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It's unclear what the exact policy reason for the nomination is. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:24, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.