Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briskfox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 08:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Briskfox

I can't work out if this is notable or not from the references because I can't read Greek or Turkish. A few days back a speedy tag was removed so I let it run hoping something would happen to it. Nothing did. I'm bringing it here for a verdict. Since I am not sure about the article and company I'd better state that this is a neutral nomination simply to get an answer! Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I also can't read Greek or Turkish, but I can see that the reference that's in the Greek alphabet points to a home page, rather than to a specific article, and that the references in the Latin alphabet don't mention the subject. Any notable "major international publisher and conference company" would certainly get plenty of hits from a Google search in the Latin alphabet, but this gets nothing. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:53, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 00:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

note that people keep removing the AfD banner from the article. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I wasn't able to find anything either. Of the references given in the article, the first two are not links to specific articles, but the front pages of online newspapers. Neither had any search results for BriskFox or likely transliterations, and I couldn't find anywhere obvious on the company's site indicating their Greek or Turkish name to search for. (The third ref, as Phil Bridger mentions above, is completely irrelevant to the company's notability.) —Korath (Talk) 14:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced, non-notable if it even exists. Edward321 (talk) 15:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a "major" publisher would have a web presence. This does not. It's an ad, at best. J L G 4 1 0 4 02:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.