Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bro. Michael Dimond
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 08:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Bro. Michael Dimond (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
prod contested for no reason (at least no reason given) I prod'd because I find no notability listed in the article. Millions of people have "founded" websites. Myself - I have about 5 of them. But I know I am notable for that. If this particular website is notable, and by inference it's founder, no one has said so in the article, which is where it should be said. Information on why someone is notable should not be inferred but shared with everyone in the article, which is appropriate for an encyclopedia. Postcard Cathy 10:04, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- DO NOT DELETE. He is well known in Catholic circles. Just cause you don't like someone does not mean removed the article. Josef Stalin has his own article.
- Delete The article does not assert the subjects notability, nor does it provide any sources or references with which to support the article with. Ozgod 12:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I checked on this spelling and the alternative "Diamond". Coverage (outside Dimond's/Diamond's website) is mainly blogs and message boards, and most of that is on his anti-papalist (and, therefore, to some, anti-Catholic) works. Not really notable in the secular or nonsecular community. I suggest the article on his "monastery" be put up for deletion as well.--Sethacus 15:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, and because Wikipedia is not a tract table. Bearian 01:17, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.