Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Lefebvre (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Frog and the Peach. Notability is not inherited. (non-admin closure) Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 23:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Lefebvre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:BIO requirements for notability. A couple very brief mentions in the New York Times does not qualify as significant coverage in multiple sources. Rusf10 (talk) 18:55, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose a merge as Frog and Peach page should probably be deleted due to lack of notability as well.--Rusf10 (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:45, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.