Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brunei–Spain relations (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brunei–Spain relations

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD was kept on the basis of keep !voters saying relations exist and sources would be available, I find no evidence of WP:SIGCOV of these relations. The article is still largely based on a primary source. LibStar (talk) 05:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Brunei, and Spain. Kpg jhp jm 07:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per lack of significant coverage. Yilloslime (talk) 15:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Many of the keep !votes in the last AfD were based off of the fact that relations exist, which doesn't necessarily mean notability. Some of the keep !votes mentioned a war between Spain and Brunei in 1578, however as Curbon7 said at that AfD, there has been little diplomatic interaction since. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.