Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Rust
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 00:33, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Bryan Rust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Amateur player who fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY. Can be recreated when/if he meets it or otherwise achieves notability. Was a contested prod based on there are other worse pages that haven't been deleted. DJSasso (talk) 17:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (barney) @ 22:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania -related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (talk to me) @ 22:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (lecture) @ 22:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: However much I'd like to, I can't say Bryan Rust meets enough of a criteria for notability. He'll be brought back is that changes, however. PensRule11385 (talk) 11:03, 27 May 2013 (CST)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 23:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Does not meet N or GNG, most of the play history is unsourced. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 23:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.