Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunny Bread
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I've counted the opinion of the bunnies as a "neutral" !vote with no specific arguments for or agains deletion Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Bunny Bread (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Violation of WP:2 SENTENCES possibly? No sources, and the external link is just a link to the product's website --ZLMedia 21:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete - The company doesn't even have a page; the product certainly doesn't need one.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 22:03, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As per nom and Gaarmyvet above. -- HighKing++ 16:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.