Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C&K Markets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

C&K Markets

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged as not-notable by Aboutmovies over 2 years ago, in 2014. One source says it went into and out of bankruptcy. Notable? Sagecandor (talk) 22:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, absolutely no sign of notability. No reliable sources are listed in this article. SPEEDY DELETION PLEASE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scorpion293 (talk • contribs)
Comment: The current article content is minimal but it is worth taking into account the changes on Talk:C&K Markets which were proposed by an editor with a declared COI, in particular its "Community & Awards" section. AllyD (talk) 08:24, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:24, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: My searches (Highbeam, Google) are not finding in-depth coverage concerning this company, merely routine announcements. As to the various award placements listed on the Talk page, these are predominantly local or table listings (e.g. #98 in the National Retail Federation 2013 list), which fall under WP:AUD. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH or wider WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I found their press release on their website, which was published on October 18, 2016. It states several store closures by year's end. In my opinion, it seems some store locations still exist, however it needs more coverage in reliable source for notability. Techwikiwitty (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.