Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CE Destinations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CE Destinations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This feels very spammy. The article contains no reliable sources, nor can I find any for this company. bd2412 T 16:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 19:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No WP:RS found which can support this primary-sourced article. The site is also unrated on Alexa and appears to have minimal social media presence. Fails WP:NWEB, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 19:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No secondary sources at all, completely sourced to the company's own website. Advertising-type text. Bishonen | talk 02:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Agree with nom. Fails WP:SPIP. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.