Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CIA activities in Asia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested despite limited discussion. Sandstein 12:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CIA activities in Asia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In addition to CIA activities in Asia, I am nominating the following related articles for deletion:

In this case, while the templates—Template:CIA activities in Africa, Template:CIA activities in the Americas, Template: CIA activities in Asia, Template: CIA activities in Russia and Europe—serve a valuable purpose by directing readers to the relevant country-specific pages, the articles themselves are largely an incoherent mess of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. CIA activities in Russia and Europe is a bit better than the other three, but even there virtually all of the content is redundant. TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 22:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete~~Undecided~~ (Edit: I figure a red link is better to fix the pages at this point as opposed to maintaining them in current forms. While topic is notable, current pages are probably more likely to be improved by being deleted. End Edit) This is hard, because (and I'll only speak of CIA activities in Africa) while the general topic has a good literature, which is separate from the individual cases, and could be invaluable for the project...the general topic at this point appears as described by TTAAC. Is there such a thing as Delete without prejudice? Once again-I only went over the Africa content, and lack the background to decide on deletion on the others, but they look similar. AbstractIllusions (talk) 20:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:16, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:56, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:56, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.