Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Parson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 16:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CJ Parson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor who has played a few unnamed characters ("American journalist", "news reporter", "FBI agent") in film and television. Fails WP:BASIC with no secondary sources, fails WP:NACTOR for lacking "significant roles". Not seeing any press coverage. McGeddon (talk) 19:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: agree entirely with @McGeddon rationale. Fails notability. Quis separabit? 19:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and NACTOR, GNG, ETC. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:32, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now of course as a simple search at his IMDb finds two roles (one in production, Blindspot) and my searches found no better coverage. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notable roles, no reliable sources. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 20:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The roles appear to be non-notable, background, or non-recurring roles in entertainment. I would say they don't meet WP:NACTOR to indicate any chance of notability nor do they have WP:SIGCOV. Inclined to say delete unless the WP:BURDEN of notability is addressed. Mkdw ^talk 17:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no notable roles, doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Searches showed nothing to meet notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.