Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COD - Crews On Destiny
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 14:11, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- COD - Crews On Destiny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Articles is overly promotional. It promotes the band without citing sources. For example, the article claims that the bent "were an inspiration to the young generation", that they "had set a benchmark in Nepali music industry", and that their songs "were some of the biggest hits in Nepalese music", without citing any sources to prove this. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:42, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: The informations provided are true but no sources regarding those facts were found. So, I removed those texts. Its better removing the unreferenced promotional texts rather than deleting the article. — Ascii002 Let's talk! Contribs 23:26, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:BAND. The references added seem to be mostly to the kind website where a band creates a profile to promote itself. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Anna Frodesiak - Fails BAND, Plus all these references are just promotional crap, I myself would remove them but since the article's being deleted anyway it's just a waste of time. –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Ignoring the current shocking state of the article, fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG.SPACKlick (talk) 13:47, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.